Skip to: Navigation | Content | Footer

Unrelenting crackdown on critical voices in China

The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) is deeply concerned about the pressure applied by Chinese authorities which forced a prestigious University publication to block online access to more than 300 articles on its website.

Author: News Desk

Posted on: 23 August 2017 07:31

Unrelenting crackdown on critical voices in China

"Monopoly over a sole interpretation of so-called sensitive issue is unfortunately still the prime goal of the Chinese authorities."

As reported by the International Federation of Journalists: According to several non-Mainland media reports, the China Quarterly, a Cambridge University Press (CUP) publication, revealed that it had been subjected to continuous pressure from the Chinese authorities. According to the Hong Kong-based Apple Daily, Tim Pringle, editor of the publication said that more than 300 articles were deleted from the official website on the Mainland after they received a notice from the Chinese authorities. In addition, similar pressure was also applied to one thousand E-books. The report did not reveal any reasons given for the clampdown, but the deleted articles deal with the Tiananmen Square Massacre, Cultural Revolution, Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong and Taiwan.

While several scholars have criticised CUP for buckling under pressure, spokespersons for the CUP said that they had complied with the order because they wanted academia in Mainland China to have access to the rest of the content of the CUP. The publication is clearly worried about the escalation of censorship imposed by the Chinese and is planning to discuss the issue with the Chinese authorities in the coming week during a book fair scheduled to be held in Beijing. China became a member of the International Publishers’ Association (IPA) in 2016.

The IFJ said: “One of the objectives of the Association is promoting freedom of publication, and China is clearly violating these objectives. Sadly, there is no hint that China will restrain itself from using various pretexts to impose censorship. Monopoly over a sole interpretation of so-called sensitive issue is unfortunately still the prime goal of the Chinese authorities.”

Noting that the move to censor CUP publications was one more disturbing event in the unrelenting clampdown on diverse and dissenting voices in the Xi Jinping era, the IFJ urged publishers to stand in solidarity with the Cambridge University press and called upon IPA President Michiel Kolman, and the board of Executive Committee to support its members and demand an end to censorship.

comments powered by Disqus

Most read on InPublishing

These are the most read stories on the InPublishing website over the last 14 days, in order from the top.

Articles

My Publishing Life – Adam Sherman

Adam Sherman
Posted on: 16 October 2017

Hyperlocal – making its voice heard

Nick Turner
Posted on: 26 September 2017

Vertically focused

Ciar Byrne
Posted on: 26 September 2017

It was circ wot won it!

James Evelegh
Posted on: 12 October 2017

Off The Page

David Hepworth
Posted on: 26 September 2017

All change at Condé

Meg Carter
Posted on: 26 September 2017

5 minutes with… Hutch Hicken

Hutch Hicken
Posted on: 30 September 2017

Amid New Revenue Push, Video Is The Solution Du Jour

Karlene Lukovitz
Posted on: 26 September 2017

1984 and all that

James Evelegh
Posted on: 19 October 2017

Man vs Robot

Ray Snoddy
Posted on: 26 September 2017

This list is based on data from Google Analytics, and is refreshed every 24 hours. (Last updated: 23/10/2017 08:31)

Find out more about

Featured job

Circulation Executive
Salary: Competitive
William Reed Business Media
Crawley

Featured in InPublishing Jobs

InPub Weekly: Sign-up

Click here to sign up for our free weekly email newsletter:

Sign up now!

Magazine registration

Publishing Partners Guide